Luna ISP Proxies — Buying With Crypto

Two decisions sit behind this page and they are independent: whether static ISP is the right product, and whether crypto is the right way to pay for it. The first is about the workload, the second about settlement risk.

Is ISP The Right Line Item

Priced per address, ISP is expensive if what you need is reach and cheap if what you need is continuity. Rotating residential traffic covers breadth at a per-gigabyte rate and is the better purchase for anything resembling a crawl. ISP earns its cost only where a session must survive — accounts, listings, long-lived logins. Buying it for the wrong workload is the most expensive mistake available on this page.

Why Settlement Method Matters More Here

With a metered product, a reversed payment costs you some traffic. With addresses, it costs you the identity attached to them, which is a different order of disruption. Final settlement is therefore worth more on this product than on any other, which is the practical argument for paying on-chain rather than by card.

Fee Comparison

USDT on Tron is the low-cost default at a few cents. BSC is similar. Ethereum only makes sense on larger orders where the gas fee is a small fraction. Bitcoin is workable but its fee swings with congestion, which matters more on smaller purchases.

Total Cost Over A Year

Compare on annual cost per identity rather than on unit price. Static addresses are held continuously, so the meaningful figure is what one identity costs to keep alive for twelve months, including the spares you hold against incidents. That framing usually shows a smaller, well-managed set of addresses beating a larger loosely allocated one, because unused addresses in this product cost exactly as much as busy ones and contribute nothing.