Luna Proxy Bundles — Combined Plans

The case for a bundle is arithmetic. Three products bought individually price at three separate tiers; combined they price at one blended rate, and the gap widens as the smallest of the three grows.

When It Pays And When It Does Not

A single workload does not benefit. If everything you do is crawling, buy traffic; if everything is account work, buy addresses. The bundle earns its place at the point where a second workload becomes routine rather than occasional, because that is when the second top-up starts happening on its own schedule and the blended rate begins to matter. Below that threshold the simpler plan is genuinely the better choice.

Estimating The Mix

Express each workload in its own unit before converting to money. Crawling is gigabytes: pages per day multiplied by average page weight, remembering that images and scripts count. Account work is addresses: one per identity that must stay consistent. QA is usually a small fixed number of endpoints. Only once those three figures exist is a tier comparison meaningful.

Reviewing It Later

The ratio you buy first is almost never the ratio you settle on. Look at drawdown per pool monthly and adjust at top-up rather than mid-cycle. The metric that matters is not total spend but whether any pool hit zero while another sat idle — that is the specific waste a bundle exists to remove.

Reviewing At Renewal

Bundles drift out of shape because workloads change faster than purchasing habits. Set a fixed review at each renewal that answers two questions: did any pool reach zero while another sat idle, and has a workload appeared or disappeared since the last cycle. Those two answers determine the next ratio. Teams that skip this end up renewing a shape that fitted the work two quarters ago, which is the quiet way a flexible product turns back into a rigid one.